H3H3 clearly provides their opinion within the first minute of the podcast. Although it is evident that they do not in fact agree with doing away with net neutrality, they do not dismiss the counter argument. In fact they immediately delve into the counter argument and go on to explain the reasons in which this argument is not valid. This shows that they are well versed on the subject and have the information from both sides. They explain the monopoly that is Comcast and explain that it is, for many, the only way to get internet. They explain net neutralities benefits and how those calling it the Restoring Internets Freedom Act are being deceiving. In calling it this many assume that in passing this act they will be doing something good. They are attempting to confuse the uninformed. The presentation of the companies lack of transparency makes the loss of net neutrality feel extremely calculated. The passion they have and the information they present give their arguments validity. Bringing up direct tweets and articles from these big businesses allows their audience to further understand how they are being misinformed.
0 Comments
I talk about the recent loss of net neutrality. I just want to know what else I can add and how I can make it longer. I'm trying to figure out how to make it more natural. Im not sure if I need more of myself in it or more of other outside sources. Some videos may be slightly too long. The audio in the background may take away focus from the actual video itself. 2. Personally I think the two weeks is a sufficient amount of time to create the annotated bibliography, a week would be okay too but two is much more sufficient.
3. A week was a bit short to create an extensive video but I think that it's for sure able to be done. My videos length was the only thing I struggled with extending during a short period of time. 4. I think that the amount of time we had for research was sufficient, I think any more would have been overly extensive. 5. I feel like the combination of the video review and review of the annotated bibliography is fine, I feel like it's a good use of time. 6. The lessons and homework being available and listed online has been extremely useful to me. 7. I'm genuinely content with the course. 8. I don't feel like anything needs to change as of right now. 9. I have realized that I am procrastinating on the annotated bibliography, I do have some of it done but it is not complete. I feel like besides that I have been doing a decent job at staying on top of things. https://www.networkworld.com/article/3154091/internet/the-loss-of-net-neutrality-say-goodbye-to-a-free-and-open-internet.html https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/12/14/net_neutrality_vote_great/ https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/what-losing-net-neutrality-means-for-democracy_us_5a3422a4e4b0e1b4472ae62e https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.rowan.edu/docview/747989519?pq-origsite=summon&https://search.proquest.com/abiglobal/advanced |
AuthorMy name is Merrin Keim. I am currently a Freshman at Rowan University! Archives
April 2018
Categories |